An inescapable element of a social media age, memes are everywhere, but are they all harmless? What about the ones that employ Scripture, especially for political ends?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #187 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
Meme is a word most of us would not have recognized ten years ago. Now they’re a daily occurrence.
The word meme was first coined by British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in his 1976 book, The Selfish Gene. He derived the term from the Greek word "mimema," which means "that which is imitated." For Dawkins, a meme referred to a unit of cultural transmission or imitation, such as an idea, behavior, style, or practice that spread within a culture, e.g., melodies, religious beliefs, catchphrases, or fashion trends.
More recently in the 21st century, internet memes are now understood as visual, textual, or video content that spreads virally online, often through humor, satire, or commentary on societal or cultural phenomena.
Visit any social media platform, and you’ll see images of animals, people, landscapes, you name it, usually along with some printed observation that makes a joke, takes a potshot at a political rival, celebrates some human event or achievement. The uses of memes are limitless.
Since this is audio podcast, I can’t put a few memes up on screen for you to see, but I think you understand what I’m talking about. Memes can be funny, serious, insightful, honoring and honorable, and because we’re human beings, memes can also be ill-advised and unwise, offensive, vulgar, mean, pornographic, derogatory and more.
So, what about memes? First, there’s no “Thou shalt not meme” in the Bible. Memes, of course, did not exist when Scripture was written. But the use of images as such existed, and images are not condemned in Scripture, nor considered intrinsically evil, though we are warned not to make graven images or idols out of that which we artistically create.
So, like anything else we engage in life, memes should be something we consider carefully, and about which use good discernment. In other words, it’s possible to use them harmlessly or harmfully, or wisely or unwisely.
As I said at the top, memes can be funny or make thoughtful points. I’m not “against memes,” nor is this some kind of legalistic anti-meme screed. I’m just thinking aloud with you about something that has become a part of contemporary life.
Since 2024 was a presidential election year, political memes dominated social media. But I’m not sure 2025 and thereafter will be much different. Biden memes, Harris memes, Trump memes, they’re endless.
Scripture offers several straightforward comments about Christian involvement in what we call politics.
For example,
These verses, and there are many others, teach us that Christians should care, be involved in politics and government as they deem appropriate, and trust God in all of this. So again, nothing here that suggests Christians who produce memes with political messages are somehow acting improperly.
But as I said earlier, it is possible to create memes, just like it is possible to speak or write, in a manner that is indeed an improper application of Scripture.
I confess the memes that make me uncomfortable are those that quote Scripture alongside highly partisan presentations, or ones that use Scripture or biblical imagery alongside candidates as if to bless that person as God’s choice for the office. I am even more uncomfortable with memes that basically offer not Christian but civil religion, memes that wrap the candidate in the Bible and the flag. Worst of all, there are memes that I consider sacrilegious.
Interestingly, as I was thinking about this topic and did some research in the past week, I found few memes portraying Mr. Biden or Ms. Harris in association with Christian themes or imagery. A few, but very few. Meanwhile, I found almost innumerable such memes portraying Mr. Trump in association with Christian themes or imagery.
Now let’s pause for a disclaimer: I want to talk about memes that mix or apply Christian themes or imagery alongside given candidates, mostly Mr. Trump, without this being heard as a) me blaming Mr. Trump, or b) me attacking Mr. Trump or his policies. Partisanship and politicking are not my points here.
What I want to focus upon is us discerning together whether given memes are appropriate or wise. I wish I could show you visuals, but in lieu of this, think of memes this way: memes I consider—
So, memes that make me uncomfortable—Think of memes in which Mr. Trump is being hugged by Jesus or wherein Jesus is standing with his hand on a seated Mr. Trump’s shoulder. Or another one depicting Jesus and Mr. Trump walking on water. Uncomfortable? I am.
What about civil religion? Think of memes depicting Jesus sitting beside Mr. Trump in a courtroom, or Jesus embracing Mr. Trump in the Oval Office or standing ethereally behind Mr. Trump who is seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office with the meme captioned: “Jesus is guiding Trump; Democrats and Satan are trying to stop him.
Finally, there are memes I find so offensive and impious I label them sacrilegious. One meme shows Jesus hanging on the cross in the background and Mr. Trump standing victoriously in front of him—I don’t even know what this means.
Another meme depicts Mr. Trump as a great image in the sky above a crowd of people while heavenly aura beams out from Mr. Trump’s image. I guess this one is attempting to make Mr. Trump a deity. There are memes in which Jesus wears a MAGA hat, memes where Mr. Trump is dressed in a white robe, hands folded in prayer and a halo glowing around his head.
One blasphemous meme depicts a shirtless Mr. Trump wearing a crown of thorns and hanging on a cross alongside a caption: “I drained the swamp. Promises kept. They had me impeached. Jesus wept…Never…forget.”
Then there’s the meme that portrays Mr. Trump in a white robe wearing a crown of thorns with a cross on a wall behind him. Strangely, four or five Jesus characters stand behind him.
Lastly, a profane meme portrays a dark-haired Mr. Trump, presumably to resemble Jesus, with his hand raised like a pope and a caption: “He shall rise again in 2024.”
I know it is more difficult to follow this on audio than to see these memes in visuals. Just do a search like “Trump and Christian memes” or “Trump and Jesus memes.” Then go into the image pages and you will see some of the memes I’ve highlighted and more. Draw your own conclusions on whether any of these make you feel uncomfortable or are indeed sacrilegious, irreverent, or desecration.
Again, I am not saying all memes are bad or wrong or unspiritual. I’m not blaming Mr. Trump for these memes. I’d make the same observations if my image was being propagandized as somehow especially blessed by Jesus. Toward good discernment, remember these points:
Blessings to you.
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2025
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers, or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.
It’s a new year – I haven’t made resolutions, but I do have hopes for the days ahead; how about you?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #186 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
Hope springs eternal, so they say.
“Hope springs eternal" is an idiomatic expression that conveys the idea that humans inherently possess an enduring sense of hope, no matter the difficulties they face.
It expresses the notion that people retain hope and optimism, even in discouraging circumstances. The phrase…comes from Alexander Pope's poem ‘An Essay on Man’ from the 18th century. The full line reads, ‘Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never is, but always to be blest.’ This poetic line emphasizes the unwavering spirit of optimism in humans.”
>At the end of the magnificent movie about the Civil War era, “Gone with the Wind,” after years of tragic destruction, despair, and death, central character Scarlett O’Hara said, “Tara. Home. I'll go home…After all, tomorrow is another day."
>In the Broadway musical, “Annie,” Orphan Annie sang, “The sun will come out Tomorrow. Bet your bottom dollar That tomorrow There'll be sun! Just thinking about Tomorrow Clears away the cobwebs, And the sorrow 'Til there's none! Tomorrow! Tomorrow! I love ya Tomorrow! You're always a day away”
>In the movie “Cast Away,” Tom Hanks-as-Chuck Noland wraps the film by saying, “And I know what I have to do now. I gotta keep breathing. Because tomorrow the sun will rise. Who knows what the tide could bring?”
>In Scripture, the Old Testament prophet Isaiah said, “But those who hope in the LORD will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint” (Isaiah 40:31).
I recently shared in this podcast about what scholars are calling the “Anxious Generation,” an entire cohort of American youth who are growing up filled with anxiety and despair, not so much because they do not have material goods and well-being but because they have no sense of purpose or meaning.
Some scholars blame the hours adolescents spend on smartphones, detached in another world and this without friends, without social integration. Some blame this era’s rejection of the “God who is there,” the Sovereign Creator of the Universe who not only made each of us but who gave us a desire for purpose and meaning, then told us he is the foundation and center of this purpose and meaning. Reject him and you end up with no hope, just delusional, psychotic anarchy.
Scripture gives us another view of the future: Jeremiah says, “But this I call to mind, and therefore I have hope: The steadfast love of the Lord never ceases; his mercies never come to an end; they are new every morning; great is your faithfulness. ‘The Lord is my portion,’ says my soul, ‘therefore I will hope in him’” (Lamentations 3:21-24).
The Shepherd-King David in the Old Testament, reminded us, “But the eyes of the LORD are on those who fear him, on those whose hope is in his unfailing love” (Psalm 33:18).
In the New Testament book of Hebrews, we’re instructed, “Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful” (Heb. 10:23).
Jesus said, “In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world,” (Jn. 16:33).
“Christian hope gives believers the resilience and strength to overcome the misery in the world, the Devil’s distractions, and the hardships of life in the body.”
“What is a Christian hope? It does not simply dream of a better existence or dwell in the clouds. It’s not only a fantasy of who or what people would like to be. Due to God’s presence and the concept of life, death, and Christ’s resurrection, this Christian hope is also a source of power for living independently, rather than according to the principles of a society built on greed and competitiveness.”
So, I have hope for the future based upon who God is and what he has promised. I am, or try to be, an “optimistic realist,” optimistic in the sense that I operate with that Christian hope, but a realist because Scripture has taught me about the depravity of mankind and the presence of sin.
I look forward to year 2025 with certain hopes.
Scripture says, “For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope” (Jer. 29:11).
I hope you enjoy a wonderful, blessed new year.
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2025
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers, or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.
Have you ever wondered if smartphones and social media are as wonderful for us as they are cracked up to be?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #185 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
For those of us over 30 years of age, the idea of a cell phone is still a tool of wonder. We can remember B.C.P., before cell phones. We can also remember B.I., before Internet. While the internet was used in academia during the 1980s, most of us didn’t encounter it until the mid-1990s during the Clinton Administration.
I remember my first car phone in the 1990s and my first mobile flip phone not long thereafter. I remember cell phones first being shown on television shows in the 1980s, like Miami Vice, when Sonny Crocket would pick up a phone the size of a brick.
We remember we had a life back then. We communicated, just differently. We researched information and learned, just differently. We listened to music and radio, just differently. If you’re over 30 you remember all this.
But it is in the 2000s that internet and cell phones became foundations for what we now call smartphones. The smartphone hit the market in 2007. (p. 32) You may also remember sensing the emergence of “a widely shared sense of techno-optimism; (the belief) these products made life easier, more fun, and more productive.” (p. 3) This technological, commercial tsunami launched what scholar Jonathan Haidt calls “the Great Rewiring of childhood,” based upon a rapid introduction of new handheld techno wizardry. His book—The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness—"tells the story of what happened to the generation born after 1995, popularly known as Gen Z, the generation that follows the millennials.” (p. 5)
Was embracing smartphones wise? Was it safe? No one knew. New York University Professor Haidt noted, “We don’t let kids buy tobacco, or alcohol, or go in casinos,” but we ignored the harmful effects of the overuse of smartphone technology. (p. 5)
Professor Haidt says “happened to the generation” because American youth were handed a powerful new tool or toy that captured hours of their time each day, literally transformed how they thought and learned, engaged them with an unknown online set of contacts mislabeled a “community” while disengaging them from family, friends, recreation, and the great outdoors, thus introducing a massive wave of social detachment. Smartphones exposed the minds of youth to personal and world problems through a daily immersion of the worst news. (p. 39)
MIT professor Sherry Turkle described life with smartphones this way: ‘We are forever elsewhere.’ (p. 34) So not long after this new tech access is it any wonder a global teenage mental health crisis exploded?
The Great Rewiring via smartphones “hit girls much harder than boys: the increased prevalence of posting images of oneself, after smartphones added front-facing cameras (2010) and Facebook acquired Instagram (2012), boosting its popularity. This greatly expanded the number of adolescents posting carefully curated photos and videos of their lives for their peers and strangers, not just to see, but to judge. Gen Z became the first generation in history to go through puberty with a portal in their pockets that called them away from the people nearby and into an alternative universe that was exciting, addictive, unstable.” (p.6)
“While girls' social lives moved onto social media platforms, boys burrowed deeper into the virtual world as they engaged in a variety of digital activities, particularly immersive online multiplayer video games, YouTube, Reddit, and hardcore pornography—all of which became available anytime, anywhere, for free, right on their smartphones.” (p. 35)
Interestingly, “there was little sign of an impending mental illness crisis among adolescents in the 2000s. Then, quite suddenly, in the early 2010s, things changed.” Two mental disorders skyrocketed among adolescents in the 2010s: anxiety, depression. For example, “E.R. visits for self-harm increased 188% 2010 - 2020 for girls. 48% for boys.” “Suicide rates increased 91% boys and 167% girls 2010-2020.” (p. 30-31)
“Between 2010 and 2015, the social lives of American teens moved largely onto smartphones with continuous access to social media, online video games, and other internet-based activities. This Great Rewiring of Childhood, (Professor Haidt) argues, is the single largest reason for the tidal wave of adolescent mental illness that began in the early 2010s.” (p. 44)
“The sheer amount of time that adolescents spend with their phones is staggering, even compared with the high levels of screen time they had before the invention of the iPhone. Studies of time use routinely find that the average teen reports spending more than seven hours a day on screen-based leisure activities (not including school and homework).” (p. 139) This results in social deprivation – less time with real human contact – sleep deprivation – yielding “depression, anxiety, irritability, cognition. deficits, poor learning, lower grades, more accidents, and more deaths from accidents.” Then attention fragmentation – not able to focus and stay on task, and addiction – with social media companies using behaviorist techniques to “hook” youth into being heavy users. (p. 140)
From this social psychologist’s point of view, “social media is a trap that ensnares more girls than boys. It lures people in with the promise of connection and communion, but then it multiplies the number of relationships while reducing their quality, therefore making it harder to spend time with a few close friends in real life. This may be why loneliness spiked so sharply among girls in the early 2010s, while for boys the rise was more gradual.” It makes girls more vulnerable to stalking, or boys in their school pressuring them to share nude photographs of themselves. It makes boys more vulnerable to cyberbullying and pornography. (p. 173)
Where does religion if not biblical Christianity fit in this smartphone social media Great Rewiring?
“Soon before his death in 1662, the French philosopher Blaise Pascal wrote a paragraph often paraphrased as ‘there is a God-shaped hole in every human heart.’ (p. 215) The scholar-author Jonathan Haidt states that he agrees with Pascal but in an earlier book Professor Haidt tried to explain the source of this God-shaped hole in the human heart by drawing on Darwinian evolutionary theory. “Many of my religious friends, (Haidt says) disagree about the origin of our God-shaped hole; they believe that the hole is there because we are God's creations and we long for our creator. But although we disagree about its origins, we agree about its implications: There is a hole, an emptiness in us all, that we strive to fill. If it doesn't get filled with something noble and elevated, modern society will quickly pump it full of garbage. That has been true since the beginning of the age of mass media, but the garbage pump got 100 times more powerful in the 2010s. It matters what we expose ourselves to.” (p. 215-216)
Religion, particularly Christianity, teaches us that to be “slower to judge and quicker to forgive are good for maintaining relationships and improving mental health. Social media trains people to do the opposite: Judge quickly and publicly, lest ye be judged for not judging whoever it is that we are all condemning today. Don't forgive, or your team will attack you as a traitor. From a spiritual perspective, social media is a disease of the mind. Spiritual practices and virtues, such as forgiveness, grace, and love, are a cure.” (p. 211)
Professor Haidt observes, “There is a ‘God-shaped hole’ in every human heart. Or, at least, many people feel a yearning for meaning, connection, and spiritual elevation. A phone-based life often fills that hole with trivial and degrading content.” (p. 218)
To combat the effects of the Great Rewiring, Professor Haidt concludes his seminal work with “four foundational reforms:
This is a scholarly book. It is thorough, well-documented, current, and loaded with common sense. Parents should heed the warnings and recommendations in this book, as should church youth groups, and certainly all educational institutions.
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2024
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers, or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.
Probably most of us look forward to Christmas, the memories, the family, friends, and food, the traditions. Ever wonder where some of those traditions started and why?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #184 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
In the past 2,000+ years since the humble but majestic birth of Christ the Savior in Bethlehem, people the world over have celebrated this event with now thousands of Christmas traditions.
The Bible does not provide specific practices for us to follow regarding the celebration of Christmas, as it does, for example, regarding communion or baptism. But as with all things in our lives, believers should assure our practices and traditions align with or do not violate Scripture.
Christmas traditions include the Nativity story or Christmas crèche, Advent, Christmas trees, Christmas carols, special foods and family gatherings, gift-giving, and varying traditions developed by different Christian groups worldwide.
“In the Middle Ages, Christmas celebrations were rowdy and raucous—a lot like today’s Mardi Gras parties. By the early 1800s, Americans made Christmas a family holiday for warmth, tranquility, and peace. Christmas was declared a federal holiday in the United States on June 26, 1870.”
“The Christmas crèche, also known as the Nativity scene, “a beloved Christian Christmas tradition…originated in Italy during the 13th century, when St. Francis of Assisi wanted to create a live representation of the Nativity story…The Nativity scene holds deep symbolic meaning for Christians. It reminds believers of the central message of Christmas: the love and grace of God.”
“The Nativity story is more than just a religious Christmas tradition or a way to celebrate the holiday season. It is a reminder of the profound and powerful message of Christianity – that God loves humanity so much that He sent His only Son to earth to save us. The Nativity story reminds us of the importance of humility, kindness, and compassion, values that are at the core of the Christian faith.
The Nativity story also reminds us of the miracle of the Christmas season – that even in the darkest days of winter, there is hope and joy to be found.”
My Good Wife and I are blessed with four children. When they were little and on into their college years, we developed a family tradition around the Nativity scene.
Early in our marriage before we had children, we began buying individual, 4”, realistic-looking Nativity set figures at the big Sears store at the mall. As I recall now, we purchased these over two or three Christmases. Once we had a full set, I made a manger or barn out of spare lumber, a piece of old paneling, and sticks—yes, sticks from trees in our yard. Then I added a brown felt cloth for the ground and sprinkled fake straw. Voilà, we had our manger scene.
Every year, day after Thanksgiving, we’d find the manger and its Nativity figures and then I’d unwrap them one by one as the kids took turns placing them in the manger. Mom unwrapped a few figures too or watched nearby. We always saved the Baby Jesus until last and rotated each year who got to place the Baby in the manger. Our tradition did not take long, but it was fun and a big deal for the kids. This kicked off the Christmas season with a focus on the meaning of Christmas and the message of the nativity.
Our kids were spread out in age, a daughter and son two and one-half years apart, then 4 years, and another two sons two and one-half years apart. So back then, I’d come home and ask, “Where’re the kids,” meaning the older, followed by, “Where’re the little boys?”
It was one of the little boys that introduced a funny story. One day after the placing of the figures in the manger, I walked into our bathroom, then found my wife and said, “There’s a cow in our tub.” One of the little guys stole a cow from the manger scene, carried it awhile, then pitched it in the tub. Thankfully, it did not break. Not even a chip.
Interestingly, when they were wee little like that, all the kids tended to focus on the Baby Jesus and could frequently be found carrying the Babe around in the house. Something about the Baby attracted their little hearts.
Later with our children and now with our grandchildren, you can peak into the Nativity scene and perhaps find Yoda or a dinosaur or maybe an elephant. It’s all in good fun.
In Frankenmuth, Michigan, we are blessed with Bronner’s CHRISTmas WONDERLAND, reputedly the world’s largest Christmas store. “Founded in 1945 by Wally Bronner, Bronner's CHRISTmas WONDERLAND is visited annually by over two million people.” We visit this store every few years simply to walk through the acres of lights and ornaments and Christmas wonder.
My favorite stop is the Nativity section, wherein Bronner’s features a not-for-sale collection of several Nativity sets from around the globe, along with many varieties one can purchase. The interesting thing about the global Christmas crèche representations is that the people in the manger scenes look like the people or cultures or countries that created them. In other words, there are Korean and central African, SE Asian, Eskimo, South American, and Pacific Island people in the manger scenes, representing the key characters of the biblical story.
Some people reject this, saying it is somehow improper because the real Nativity characters were Jewish. Some go a step farther and criticize this as “cultural appropriation,’ the supposedly imperialistic commandeering of others’ cultures for your own designs. Some see this as a threat to the biblical account.
But I do not. I like this. In fact, when one can see oneself in the Advent and the redemptive story it portends, I think this is a wonderful application of Scripture.
This said, perhaps not all Christmas traditions are worthy, so how should believers evaluate the appropriateness of Christmas practices and traditions? We might “lament how friends, families, churches, and in some ways, we ourselves get drawn into the craziness. Folks would get to the end of the season worn out, in debt, overweight, and with this weird and depressing sense that they’d missed the point of Christmas.”
One key doctrinal source of direction is what’s called “Christian liberty.” This doctrine allows for differences in practice among believers, but at the same time provides direction for our evaluation. Did we inherit our traditions from our culture? Are they harmless or harmful? The Scripture says all things are lawful for us, but not all things are helpful or build up (1 Cor. 10:23-29).
In some countries, certain Christmas traditions are mixed with pagan ideas that are presented alongside or integrated with Christian teaching. It’s difficult to understand how the German Christmas demon figure called Krampus that supposedly visits children and punishes badly behaving ones is at all edifying or good for children. It certainly is not biblical.
Or we could get carried away so much with the secular emphasis on gift-giving and lights and materialism, that we lose sight of what we sometimes call “the real meaning of Christmas.”
For a while in the US, a secular movement tried to remove religious references from Christmas entirely – saying “Happy Holidays” rather than “Merry Christmas,” nixed playing religious carols in stores or public spaces, and removed Nativity displays from county courthouse lawns, etc. It’s now a cliché, but we do, indeed, need to “Keep Christ in Christmas.”
Another tradition: though he is a kind-hearted, merry old soul, some argue the Santa Claus tradition should not be celebrated with children.
“The legend of Santa Claus can be traced back to a monk named St. Nicholas who was born in Turkey around A.D. 280.
St. Nicholas, a Christian saint known for his kindness and generosity. gave away his inherited wealth and traveled the countryside helping the poor and sick, becoming known as the protector of children.
St. Nicholas first entered American popular culture in the late 18th century among Dutch families in New York…In 1822, Episcopal minister Clement Clarke Moore wrote a Christmas poem called ‘An Account of a Visit from St. Nicholas,’ more popularly known today by its first line: “Twas the Night Before Christmas.” The poem depicted Santa Claus as a jolly man who flies from home to home on a sled driven by reindeer to deliver toys.” It’s all harmless fun.
Clearly, Christmas is a special time. I wish you a Merry Christmas and pray you and yours enjoy many worthy traditions. If not, I encourage you to start some traditions for your family.
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2024
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers, or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.
If you are conservative, you probably feel like the country dodged a bullet in the last presidential election, whatever your feelings about the winning candidate. If so, what now?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #183 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
The 2024 U.S. Presidential election is in the books, and former president Donald J. Trump, Republican, soundly defeated Vice President Kamala Harris, Democrat. While I don’t think the President-elect walks on water and in fact have a few concerns about his persona, I confess that I was greatly relieved at the election results.
I am one, in fact, who believes the U.S. dodged a bullet – or rather based upon my Christian faith, believe that in God’s providence this country has been spared what could have been a rapid spiral into greater socialism, authoritarianism, and consequent diminishment and weakness of America. And I believe, or at least I hope, we’ve been given an opportunity to adjust several threatening policies and trends – including an ongoing politicization of government agencies like the Department of Justice, FBI, and more, a continuation of so-called “woke” or DEI policies rooted in Marxist, racist theory, an escalation of abortion on demand and the promotion of sexual libertinism including the mutilation of children in the propagandistically-named “gender-affirming” care, and much more direct threats, most especially those undermining the First Amendment.
I believe this because the Democrat Party has long since been captured by what’s called the – ill-named again – “Progressives.” While President Joe Biden promised in his 2021 inaugural address to govern in the middle, on his first day in office he tacked left—not liberal, people who still believe in the U.S.A., but left, people who reject nearly every ideal upon which the United States was founded, and Mr. Biden then governed in a way promoted by these extremists in his party.
This produced a highly inflationary economy, a debacle in Afghanistan, weakness on the world stage including the Middle East, and an intentional, some say treasonous, policy that ruined U.S. borders and invited a host of military-age men to flood the U.S., not in a desire for freedom or a chance to work, as was the case of millions coming through Ellis Island a century ago, but rather displaying an aggressive entitlement desire for handouts—smart phones, free hotel rooms, free food, transportation, health insurance, monthly income – which political leaders foolishly gave out in a brash effort to secure future votes and power.
Not every Democrat for sure, but the national Democrat Party is now decidedly not the party of my father-in-law who as a Marine fought on Guadalcanal, coming home with a Purple Heart and a Silver Star. Back then, the Democrats were the working- or middle-class man’s party that cared about opportunities for the economic have nots. Now, national Democrat Party leaders and activists are elitist, leftist, woke, pro-choice, anti-capitalist, open border globalists who seem to despise their own country and the freedom ideals that made it strong in the first place.
This does not mean the national Republican Party is the epitome and emblem of all that’s peaches and cream, right and good. While the Republican Party’s policies, including what we’ve seen thus far of what will be the new Trump Administration, focus on law and order, fiscal responsibility, peace through strength, traditional morality, and the rediscovery of truth, standards, excellence, and common sense, still, Republican politicians are just people, at times drawn into unwise political initiatives or, as we’ve seen in the so-called Establishment, “do-nothing,” “keep your head down” efforts to maintain their positions.
So, yes, I think our Sovereign God blessed America, gave us another chance to be “a shining city on the hill” and a beacon of freedom and prosperity for our citizenry and to the world. But the election is only a beachhead. We must follow through.
In this podcast and, actually most of my writing over the last 30 years, I’ve tried not to write in a simply partisan way. One reason is that I believe biblical teaching and a Christian worldview should be brought to bear on all things political, social, and cultural, including political parties. In other words, as in the title of this podcast, we should exercise “discernment” in all things.
Another reason I’ve avoided openly partisan writing is that I wanted to preserve my own freedom of conscience to express my views as I deemed appropriate without allegiance to partisan politics. Finally, the political parties are not always right or correct or even morally astute. At least in writing, I wanted to be free to say this if I thought it was warranted.
I never liked and still don’t when conservative writers or Republicans lob cheap insults at President Joe Biden for his obvious dementia and other indicators of advancing age, e.g., make fun of him when he stumbles or slurs his words. This comes to us all if we live long enough. It seems to me there is a boatload of Mr. Biden’s policies and political initiatives or public statements with which I disagree, all fair game for critique, so why resort to vocabulary borrowed from World Wrestling Entertainment?
Besides, I hold Mr. Biden’s family and staff partly responsible for propping him up in what could legitimately be called elder abuse.
I never liked and still don’t when conservative writers or Republicans lob shallow arguments at Vice President Kamala Harris. By shallow arguments, I mean references to her being a woman, a Black or Indian woman. Who cares about her sex and race?
Though I will say this, Vice President Harris proved to be what many already knew or suspected going into the coup-based campaign – an inept candidate unable to handle even softball interviews, let alone in-depth questions about national political issues. In my view, President Biden made a mistake during his campaign to become president when he publicly promised to choose a woman as VP. I am not against women being VP. In fact, that’s part of my point. I knew when he did this, he would come under enormous pressure to choose a woman of color.
Nothing wrong with this either, but candidate Biden backed himself into corner where he felt forced to choose from a short-list handed to him by leftist activists.
Point is, there are many women and many women of color who could handle the job of Vice President or President and who could run circles around VP Kamala Harris in talent, political skills, experience, and vision. Yet Mr. Biden chose the weakest in his list. Makes you wonder why.
I honestly feared for Mr. Biden’s health and well-being. I still do. I don’t want any president, no matter his politics, to die in office. But I most certainly do not want this to happen to Mr. Biden, then or now till Jan. 20, 2025, because I genuinely think a “President” Kamala Harris would put the USA in a vulnerable position.
So, if indeed we’ve dodged a bullet – and the Lord has given the USA both a reprieve from what could have been and an opportunity for what could be, what are we going to do with it? I’ll share this here:
There is much more, of course, but let’s remember what Scripture says:
“Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no salvation.
When his breath departs, he returns to the earth; on that very day his plans perish” (Ps. 146:3-4).
And also, “I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way” (1 Tim. 2:1-2).
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2024
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.
Does it amaze you as it does me, that in a generation, rainbow flags have become globally ubiquitous, that the LGBTQ+ movement is now visible in every subsection of society, including religion?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #182 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
In a few earlier podcasts, I’ve addressed what was once called Gay and is now called the LGBTQ+ movement, Pride month, and related issues like same-sex marriage.
Pride month, not just a day but an entire month, suddenly declared as a national if not global time of obeisance to immorality is particularly egregious because it is visual, “Out, Loud, and Proud” as proponents say, in your face.
In June, nearly nude people parade about on city streets wearing. chains, leather, animal fur, or artificial, exaggerated anatomical parts. This is not pride but perversion. It is not freedom. It is enslavement, bacchanalia, debauchery.
Add Drag Queen, people who now openly chant, “We’re coming for your children,” and you get human debasement on a level with anything you’ve read about in ancient pagan civilizations. Sodom and Gomorrah would feel right at home.
One highly successful marketing and messaging tool developed by the LGBTQ+ movement is the now near-ubiquitous rainbow flag.
The rainbow flag, also known as the gay pride flag or LGBTQ pride flag, is now a globally recognized symbol representing LGBTQ outward identity, support, and “pride.” The original creator of the pride flag is Gilbert Baker, a gay artist who wanted to make a proud statement through a symbol showing diversity. He believed that the rainbow was ideal because it is found in nature. The original gay pride flags flew at the San Francisco Gay Freedom Day Parade celebration on June 25, 1978.
The initial rainbow flag had eight colors, including pink to represent sex, red for life, orange for healing, yellow for sunlight, green for nature, turquoise for art, indigo for harmony, and violet for spirit. Today, the original colors remain except for pink and turquoise.
“On June 26, 2015, the White House was illuminated in the rainbow flag colors to commemorate the legalization of same-sex marriages in all 50 U.S. states, following the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision.” This was the Obama Administration virtue signaling.
In recent years, in the name of “inclusion,” the rainbow flag has been updated and redesigned repeatedly to represent the intersectional diversity of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQIA2-S) communities, progress, and social justice pride.
Christian apologist and social critique Os Guinness observed, “as Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote in The Brothers Karamazov, if God is dead, everything is permitted. You can be as free as you desire to be. The only limits are the limits of your own thinking.”
Dostoevsky was half right. If God is dead, everything is indeed permitted but you are decidedly not free.In his 2024 book, Our Civilizational Moment: the Waning of the West and the War of the Worlds,Guinness goes on to say, “For Jews and Christians, the rainbow is the symbol of a divine promise–God's covenanted promise originally given to Noah after the flood as the sign of God's commitment to his creation (Gen. 9:8-17).
Whatever humanity does, the rainbow is the reminder that God will keep faith with humanity. God's faithfulness will overshadow the worst that humanity can ever do.
For the sexual revolution, on the other hand, the rainbow stands quite literally as the symbol of Pride. It stands for the revolution and its stated objective of repudiating the Jewish and Christian understanding of the created order.”“Which understanding of the symbol is to prevail? The rainbow as a reminder of God's promise? Or the rainbow as the assertion of human pride? The recent explosion of LGBTQ rainbows across the world is a deliberate inversion of its biblical and centuries–long meaning and a massive statement of where the West is today.”
Ostensibly Christian enterprise “Sojourners” website publishes articles like “How the Pride Flag Speaks to the Promises of God” by an author who says he is a Christian and a gay man.
There is a long and growing list of Protestant churches that reject traditional biblical teaching as they embrace and promote LGBTQ+ lifestyles.
Some Christian colleges and universities now allow or embrace LGBTQ+ students and, for some, staff as well, what’s sometimes called “gay-friendly campuses.”
Christian colleges and universities are currently under enormous pressure and some are changing their view of LBTQ+ matters because they’ve concluded they will lose financial support if they do not, or they will be scrutinized by accrediting agencies, or they have recalibrated their doctrinal views.
Meanwhile, the Word of God has not changed:
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Gen. 1:27).
“Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Gen. 2:24).
In Leviticus 20, God lists several sexual sins, not just homosexual sins but several heterosexual sins. In God’s eyes, sexual sin is sexual sin. He is not singling out or somehow condemning only those engaged in homosexuality.
For example, “If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death” (Lev. 20:10).
And then also, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22).
Or this, “If a man lies with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. If a woman approaches any animal and lies with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them” (Lev. 20:15-16).
In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul says, “For this reason, God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men” (Rom. 1:26-27).
“Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 7).
While Christians assume different positions regarding LGBTQ+, in my understanding of the plain English of the Scripture, these sexual behaviors are matters of choice, they are individual and thus personal responsibility, they are spiritual rebellion, not mental illness. I, therefore, cannot embrace or promote heterosexual sin nor LGBTQ+ sin, but I offer these observations:
While I cannot endorse LGBTQ+ moral choices and while I reject the perversion of the rainbow’s divine message, I recognize that each person is made in the image of God, that God loves them, and that Christ died for them as he did for me.
“Those people” are not our enemy.
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2024
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers, or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.